<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mesothelioma cancer</title>
	<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com</link>
	<description>A fact sheet about the risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of mesothelioma</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Causes and Prevention of Technical Artifacts When Studying Simian Virus 40 (SV40) in Human Mesotheliomas</title>
		<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/causes-and-prevention-of-technical-artifacts-when-studying-simian-virus-40-sv40-in-human-mesotheliomas.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/causes-and-prevention-of-technical-artifacts-when-studying-simian-virus-40-sv40-in-human-mesotheliomas.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Part Three : Epidemiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/causes-and-prevention-of-technical-artifacts-when-studying-simian-virus-40-sv40-in-human-mesotheliomas.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } 
Introduction to the SV40 Genome, SV40 Early Proteins Large Tumor (T)-Antigen
and Small Tumor (t)-Antigen

Simian virus (SV40) was discovered as one of the viruses capable of infecting
Macacus rhesus as well as Macacus cynomolgus monkey kidney cells (1). It also
had the possibility to infect and to transform human cells grown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } </style>
<h2><strong><span class="style1">Introduction to the SV40 Genome, SV40 Early Proteins Large Tumor (T)-Antigen<br />
and Small Tumor (t)-Antigen</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong></p>
<p>Simian virus (SV40) was discovered as one of the viruses capable of infecting<br />
Macacus rhesus as well as Macacus cynomolgus monkey kidney cells (1). It also<br />
had the possibility to infect and to transform human cells grown in vitro.<br />
Simian virus 40 is a DNA tumor virus that not only induces tumors in rodents but<br />
also is capable of immortaliz¬ing human mesothelial cells in vitro. Except for a<br />
report demonstrat¬ing SV40 in one metastatic melanoma, SV40 was not considered<br />
to be oncogenic in humans (2). Simian virus 40 DNA has been found in several<br />
human tumors such as choroid plexus tumors, osteosarcomas, malignant<br />
mesotheliomas, and lymphoproliferative diseases such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas<br />
(3–5). The role of the SV40 virus in human tumors has been extensively discussed<br />
in several excellent reviews (4,6,7).</p>
<p>Simian virus 40 is a double-stranded DNA virus whose genome encodes two tumor<br />
(T)-antigens known as large T-antigen and small t-antigen. Replication of the<br />
double-stranded DNA genome occurs in the nucleus of the host cell. Transcription<br />
of the genome is carried out by host cell RNA polymerase II, and large T-antigen<br />
plays a major role in regulating transcription of the viral genome by binding to<br />
the origin region of the viral genome. Protein–protein interactions between<br />
T-antigen and DNA polymerase alpha directly stimulate replication of the viral<br />
genome. Small t-antigen is not essential for virus replication but allows viral<br />
DNA to accumulate in the nucleus. Both proteins contain nuclear localization<br />
signals, which results in their accumula¬tion in the nucleus, where they migrate<br />
after being synthesized in the cytoplasm. After infection, early messenger RNAs<br />
(mRNAs) are expressed from the early promoter, which contains a strong<br />
transcrip-</p>
<p>tion enhancer element consisting of 72 base pair (bp) sequence repeats. The<br />
early proteins synthesized are the two T-antigens, large T- and small t-antigen.<br />
As the concentration of large T-antigen builds up in the nucleus, transcription<br />
of the early genes is repressed by direct binding of the protein to the origin<br />
region of the virus genome. After DNArepli-cation has occurred, transcription of<br />
late genes occurs from the late pro¬moter and results in the production of the<br />
structural proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3.<br />
</strong> <a href="http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/causes-and-prevention-of-technical-artifacts-when-studying-simian-virus-40-sv40-in-human-mesotheliomas.html#more-83" class="more-link" >(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/causes-and-prevention-of-technical-artifacts-when-studying-simian-virus-40-sv40-in-human-mesotheliomas.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Monkey to Man: The Epidemiologic Evidence of an Association Between Simian Virus 40 and Malignancy</title>
		<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/from-monkey-to-man-the-epidemiologic-evidence-of-an-association-between-simian-virus-40-and-malignancy.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/from-monkey-to-man-the-epidemiologic-evidence-of-an-association-between-simian-virus-40-and-malignancy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Part Three : Epidemiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/from-monkey-to-man-the-epidemiologic-evidence-of-an-association-between-simian-virus-40-and-malignancy.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } 
Early in the 20th century endemic poliomyelitis gradually evolved into the
most devastating epidemic in the Western world. Striking improve¬ments in public
health, ironically, were accompanied by more frequent outbreaks of crippling
poliomyelitis. By 1950, each new day brought more polio victims, an increasing
sense of crisis, and a greater need for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } </style>
<p><strong>Early in the 20th century endemic poliomyelitis gradually evolved into the<br />
most devastating epidemic in the Western world. Striking improve¬ments in public<br />
health, ironically, were accompanied by more frequent outbreaks of crippling<br />
poliomyelitis. By 1950, each new day brought more polio victims, an increasing<br />
sense of crisis, and a greater need for an effective therapy. In the United<br />
States mass vaccination for paralytic polio began in 1955 with licensing of the<br />
Salk inactivated vaccine. It is estimated that by 1960 90% of all persons under<br />
20 years of age had received at least one inoculation; a total of 98 million<br />
Americans had been immunized (1). A sharp decline in disease incidence occurred<br />
and the spread of this crippling infection was abated.</p>
<p>Amid this chronicle of success was the knowledge that numerous, presumed<br />
harmless viruses had been recovered from the primary monkey kidney cell cultures<br />
used for the efficient growth of polio virus needed for mass vaccine production.<br />
However, in 1961 Eddy and col¬leagues (2) conducted the first investigations<br />
demonstrating the devel¬opment of tumors in 71% of newborn hamsters injected<br />
with polio vaccine culture extracts. The tumors were identified as<br />
mesotheliomas, ependymomas, osteogenic sarcomas, and lymphomas. Multiple other<br />
investigators confirmed these initial findings (3–6). The oncogenic property of<br />
the cell extract was later attributed to a double-stranded DNA virus designated<br />
simian virus 40 (SV40), an indigenous pathogen in the African green monkey (7).<br />
Diamandopoulos (3) provided com-pelling evidence of the role of the virus by<br />
demonstrating that animals inoculated with anti-SV40 serum demonstrated no tumor<br />
growth. Important independent studies by Koprowski et al (8) showed that, in<br />
fact, cultured human cells underwent transformation with SV40, raising concerns<br />
about the possible consequences of human exposure to this virus.</p>
<p>Simian virus 40 and the closely related human polyomaviruses BK and Jamestown<br />
Canyon (JC) produce subclinical infection in immuno-</p>
<p>competent natural hosts. The viruses typically reside in renal epithelial cells,<br />
but can spread to other tissues and produce pathologic effects in either<br />
immunocompromised hosts or, more importantly, in nonhost species (9).<br />
Large-scale vaccine production in the United States neces¬sitated holding large<br />
numbers of caged juvenile monkeys for tissue access, amplifying the probability<br />
of transmission of SV40 from infected to nonimmune animals. The practice of<br />
pooling kidney tissue from multiple animals during vaccine production increased<br />
the likeli¬hood of viral contamination of vaccine cultures. It is now well<br />
accepted that at least 30% and perhaps as much as 70% of inactivated live<br />
vaccine produced between 1955 and 1961 was contaminated with SV40 (10). Although<br />
the U.S. government established SV40-free vaccine manu¬facturing requirements in<br />
1961, contaminated vaccine continued to be distributed through 1963.</strong></p>
<p> <a href="http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/from-monkey-to-man-the-epidemiologic-evidence-of-an-association-between-simian-virus-40-and-malignancy.html#more-81" class="more-link" >(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/from-monkey-to-man-the-epidemiologic-evidence-of-an-association-between-simian-virus-40-and-malignancy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure</title>
		<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/mesothelioma-and-asbestos-exposure.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/mesothelioma-and-asbestos-exposure.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Part Three : Epidemiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/mesothelioma-and-asbestos-exposure.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } 
Historical Background
It was the Conference on the Biological Effects of Asbestos at the New York
Academy of Sciences, organized by Irving Selikoff in November 1964 (1), that put
both mesothelioma and asbestos on the map. Before that meeting, few people in
the scientific or general community had much knowledge of either [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } </style>
<h2><strong><span class="style1">Historical Background</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong>It was the Conference on the Biological Effects of Asbestos at the New York<br />
Academy of Sciences, organized by Irving Selikoff in November 1964 (1), that put<br />
both mesothelioma and asbestos on the map. Before that meeting, few people in<br />
the scientific or general community had much knowledge of either subject. There<br />
they learned the nature and numerous essential industrial uses of a group of<br />
naturally occurring mineral fibers, collectively known as asbestos, although in<br />
fact com¬prising at least five distinct materials, chemically, physically, and<br />
geologically. Of these, chrysotile, a serpentine mineral mined mainly in Quebec<br />
and the Ural mountains of Russia, made up over 90%. Of the remainder the two<br />
most important were crocidolite and amosite, produced mainly in South Africa and<br />
Australia, both amphibole min¬erals with distinctive qualities valuable for heat<br />
insulation, naval marine use, and the production of large-bore cement pipes. Two<br />
other amphibole mineral fibers were anthophyllite, of limited production in<br />
Finland, and tremolite, little used, though by far the most widespread<br />
geologically. Presenters at the conference stated that within some 20 years of<br />
the first industrial exploitation of asbestos in the 1880s, workers heavily<br />
exposed to airborne fiber and dust developed a dis¬tinctive, seriously disabling<br />
and sometimes fatal diffuse pulmonary fibrosis, later termed asbestosis. Little<br />
was done to limit exposure until the late 1930s, when after a well-conducted<br />
survey of four asbestos textile plants in North Carolina, Dreessen et al (2) and<br />
others of the U.S. Public Health Service recommended in 1938 that a workplace<br />
dust con¬centration of 5 million particles per cubic foot (about 15 fibers/mL)<br />
should not be exceeded. Mainly because of the Second World War, this<br />
recommendation was not implemented; and probably for the same reason it went<br />
unnoticed that there were case reports by some German pathologists (3) of<br />
malignant tumors of the pleura and peritoneum in men with asbestosis. Thus it<br />
was only in the 1950s that the causal asso¬ciation of asbestos exposure with<br />
lung cancer in the United Kingdom (4), and later with mesothelioma in South<br />
Africa (5), was recognized.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Until that time even the very existence of primary malignancies of the<br />
mesotheleum was questioned by reputable pathologists. Looking back, however, a<br />
review by Saccone and Coblenz (6) in 1943 had included the identification of<br />
over 40 cases in autopsies published since 1870, and referred to two cases of<br />
“endothelioma” reported in 1767 by Lieutaud in France among 3000 autopsies. That<br />
mesothelial cancers in low frequency probably occurred well before the<br />
industrial use of asbestos is discussed more fully later. Indeed, a low<br />
background inci¬dence of unknown etiology has almost certainly continued,<br />
affecting both children and adults.</strong></p>
<p><strong> <a href="http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/mesothelioma-and-asbestos-exposure.html#more-69" class="more-link" >(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/mesothelioma-and-asbestos-exposure.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Determination of Asbestos Exposure by Pathology and Clinical History</title>
		<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/determination-of-asbestos-exposure-by-pathology-and-clinical-history.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/determination-of-asbestos-exposure-by-pathology-and-clinical-history.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Part Three : Epidemiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/determination-of-asbestos-exposure-by-pathology-and-clinical-history.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } 
The determination of whether an abnormal asbestos exposure took place is
important in mesothelioma cases because of the potential for financial
compensation and for the assessment of the likelihood of further cases occurring
from similar occupational, paraoccupational, or environmental circumstances. One
should be aware that not all mesotheliomas are associated with asbestos
exposure. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } </style>
<p><strong>The determination of whether an abnormal asbestos exposure took place is<br />
important in mesothelioma cases because of the potential for financial<br />
compensation and for the assessment of the likelihood of further cases occurring<br />
from similar occupational, paraoccupational, or environmental circumstances. One<br />
should be aware that not all mesotheliomas are associated with asbestos<br />
exposure. Spirtas et al (1) found after careful systematic inquiry that 88% of<br />
pleural and 54% of peritoneal mesotheliomas could be attributed to asbestos<br />
exposure in men in the United States but only 23% of pleural and peritoneal<br />
mesotheliomas could be attributed to asbestos in women in the United States. An<br />
earlier study of mesotheliomas in North America showed lower figures—50% in men<br />
and 5% in women (2).</strong></p>
<p><strong>There are several ways whereby a reasonable determination can be made of whether<br />
abnormal asbestos exposure has occurred in an indi¬vidual. These include (1) a<br />
detailed and reliable occupational history; (2) identification of clinical<br />
markers of exposure such as pleural plaques, diffuse pleural fibrosis, rounded<br />
atelectasis, and asbestosis; (3) histopathologic features, such as pleural<br />
plaques and asbestos bodies; and (4) mineral analyses of digested lung tissues.</strong></p>
<p><strong>In most, if not all, parts of the world, there are background exposures to<br />
asbestos both inside and outside of buildings. These have arisen from natural<br />
outcrops and from industrial activity. These are at very low levels, usually<br />
less than 0.001F/mL (F stands for the degree of fine¬ness of abrasive particles)<br />
but in some countries there are higher envi¬ronmental exposures, for example,<br />
Turkey, Corsica, Cyprus, Russia, Czechoslovakia, Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, and<br />
New Caledonia, which have given rise to asbestos-related diseases such as<br />
pleural plaques and mesotheliomas. Asbestos fibers have been found in the air<br />
and water supplies. Airborne levels of asbetos fibers are generally higher in<br />
urban than in rural areas but this has not been accompanied by a detectable<br />
increase in nonoccupational mesotheliomas (3). Interestingly, a study of<br />
airborne asbestos levels in 12 buildings where friable amosite was used as<br />
fireproofing material and generally was in poor condition, found indoor<br />
concentrations indistinguishable from outdoor levels,<br />
 <a href="http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/determination-of-asbestos-exposure-by-pathology-and-clinical-history.html#more-66" class="more-link" >(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/determination-of-asbestos-exposure-by-pathology-and-clinical-history.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malignant Mesothelioma and Erionite</title>
		<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/malignant-mesothelioma-and-erionite.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/malignant-mesothelioma-and-erionite.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Part Three : Epidemiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/malignant-mesothelioma-and-erionite.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } 
Cancer has been known for millennia, but the understanding we have of its
origins and causes are comparatively recent. Ancient Egyptians first recorded
cancer as a disease some 4500 years ago. However, it wasn’t until the 18th
century that observations on environmental cancers were made, as people started
to look for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } </style>
<p><strong>Cancer has been known for millennia, but the understanding we have of its<br />
origins and causes are comparatively recent. Ancient Egyptians first recorded<br />
cancer as a disease some 4500 years ago. However, it wasn’t until the 18th<br />
century that observations on environmental cancers were made, as people started<br />
to look for a connection between certain environments, including working<br />
practices and human cancer incidence patterns. The idea emerged that the causes<br />
of cancer may be divided roughly into two broad categories: exogenous, which is<br />
envi¬ronmental and occupational, and endogenous, which is something inherent in<br />
the person. While this has been a useful distinction, advances in genetics now<br />
seem to be blurring the boundary. The result is that cancer research has<br />
concentrated on the identification of envi¬ronmental and occupational causes of<br />
human cancer. By the late 19th century the study of cancer tissues had revealed<br />
that cancer cells were markedly different in biology and cell structures when<br />
compared with the normal cells in the surrounding tissue. During the 20th<br />
century, the research in cancer increased in an almost exponential fashion.<br />
Advances in genetics, biochemistry, and molecular biology have begun to allow<br />
some insight into what was happening when a normal cell was changed into a<br />
cancerous one and often why it happened. Gene therapy approaches for inherited<br />
and acquired lung diseases are reviewed else¬where (1). Modification of erionite<br />
and its effects on in vitro activity is discussed in Brown et al (2). The<br />
genetic susceptibility to mesothelioma has been introduced and discussed in the<br />
literature (3–6).</strong></p>
<p><strong>Cancer can take many forms and is usually named after the cell type from which<br />
it is transformed. Once a cancer cell has arisen, clonal expansion without<br />
regard for the surrounding tissue, accounts for the clinical symptoms of the<br />
disease. As the tumor grows, continuous dedifferentiation occurs and cells break<br />
away to form new cancers at other sites in the body. It is this metastatic<br />
growth that accounts for most of the mortality from this disease. A few tumor<br />
types are so aggressive in their development that they kill the host before<br />
metas¬tasis even begins. One such cancer is mesothelioma, which is a cancer of<br />
the lining of the body cavity and named for its development from<br />
 <a href="http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/malignant-mesothelioma-and-erionite.html#more-65" class="more-link" >(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/malignant-mesothelioma-and-erionite.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Molecular Epidemiology of Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/molecular-epidemiology-of-mesothelioma-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/molecular-epidemiology-of-mesothelioma-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Part Three : Epidemiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/molecular-epidemiology-of-mesothelioma-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } 
Over the past 50 years epidemiology has been involved in the field of cancer
research. By studying the association between risk factors and cancer
occurrence, epidemiologists have contributed to the identifica¬tion of the most
important determinants of cancer in humans. In recent years, epidemiologists
have concentrated on the link between genetic and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } </style>
<p><strong>Over the past 50 years epidemiology has been involved in the field of cancer<br />
research. By studying the association between risk factors and cancer<br />
occurrence, epidemiologists have contributed to the identifica¬tion of the most<br />
important determinants of cancer in humans. In recent years, epidemiologists<br />
have concentrated on the link between genetic and environment in carcinogenesis,<br />
by focusing interests on low-level exposures.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Indeed, traditional epidemiology, called “black box epidemiology,” is unable to<br />
study the mechanistic aspects of a disease (1). Therefore, the design of<br />
epidemiologic studies has been enriched by introducing biologic markers (Fig.<br />
14.1), and step-by-step molecular epidemiology has been created. This new<br />
research, Perera (2) states, “seeks to combine the precision of laboratory<br />
methods to quantify carcinogenic dose or preclinical response in humans, with<br />
the relevance and rigor of analytic epidemiology.” This new research philosophy<br />
is based on properly designed epidemiologic studies that take into account the<br />
control of confounding factors, the selection of appropriate control groups, the<br />
power of the studies, and the extent to which a biologic marker can predict<br />
cancer occurrence (3,4).</strong></p>
<p><strong>The aim of molecular epidemiology is to assess individual exposures to<br />
carcinogens and to quantify genetic damages linked to individ¬ual<br />
susceptibility, in order to estimate cancer risk at the individual level.<br />
Studies of genetically susceptible subgroups can detect high-risk subjects and<br />
can implement new methodologies to prevent cancer at the primary<br />
(chemoprevention) or secondary (screening programs) prevention level. Moreover,<br />
a better understanding of the natural history of cancer may also improve cancer<br />
treatment, by selecting the patients who will be able to benefit from specific<br />
therapies. In addition, a multidisciplinary approach between molecular<br />
biologists and epidemiologists, as well as physicians and biostatisticians, is<br />
needed.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The outcome of malignant mesothelioma (MM) is poor, and the therapy of the<br />
disease has not progressed in the past decade (5). But MM is largely preventable<br />
because the causative factors are mostly of<br />
 <a href="http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/molecular-epidemiology-of-mesothelioma-2.html#more-64" class="more-link" >(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/molecular-epidemiology-of-mesothelioma-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asbestos Mineralogy and Health Effects</title>
		<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/molecular-epidemiology-of-mesothelioma.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/molecular-epidemiology-of-mesothelioma.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Part Three : Epidemiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/molecular-epidemiology-of-mesothelioma.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } 
Fibers and fibrous minerals, for example, the asbestos minerals, erion-ite
(one of the many natural and synthetic zeolite species) (1), fiber¬glass, or
other silica forms (diatoms) have been shown to be extremely hazardous. Their
airborne character is paramount, and the specific gravity of the species, the
size, and an appropriate morphology that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } </style>
<p><strong>Fibers and fibrous minerals, for example, the asbestos minerals, erion-ite<br />
(one of the many natural and synthetic zeolite species) (1), fiber¬glass, or<br />
other silica forms (diatoms) have been shown to be extremely hazardous. Their<br />
airborne character is paramount, and the specific gravity of the species, the<br />
size, and an appropriate morphology that permits suspension are of primary<br />
consideration. Asbestos as a ubiq¬uitous natural resource refers to several<br />
types of fibrous minerals formed by earth processes and made up of microscopic<br />
bundles of fibers. The dangers associated with inhalation of asbestos fibers<br />
have been known for more than 30 years. Asbestos is known as a group A human<br />
carcinogen. The potential hazards of exposure to asbestos mate¬rials are of<br />
concern worldwide. There are several modes of exposure to airborne fibers<br />
including occupational exposure and the erosion of natural deposits in<br />
asbestos-bearing rocks. Asbestos may also be dis¬persed in water from a number<br />
of sources, including erosion of natural deposits, corrosion, and disintegration<br />
of asbestos materials.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Governments and industries have introduced regulatory measures requiring safety<br />
controls throughout the product life cycle to limit asbestos exposure to the<br />
general public and workers. Although asbestos materials have been well<br />
documented as to their physical and chemical characteristics, they remain under<br />
investigation both by min¬eralogists studying geologic aspects and by<br />
pathologists/epidemiolo-gists studying medical aspects. The term asbestos may be<br />
well known, but the precise definition, safe level of exposure, duration of<br />
exposure, and asbestos types of these fibrous materials still raise questions<br />
and often lead to differences of opinions and arguments as well as legal<br />
disputes (2).</strong></p>
<h2><strong><span class="style1">Mineralogy of Asbestos Group Minerals</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong>The six different types of asbestos fibers are divided into two mineral groups<br />
based upon the crystalline structures: serpentine and amphi-bole asbestos.<br />
Asbestiform minerals are not always found with a</strong></p>
<p><strong>fibrous habit. Tremolite, for example, occurs naturally in three distinct<br />
morphologic forms or mineral habits. It may occur as asbestos, splin¬tery<br />
fibers, or in massive crystalline deposits. Any mechanical manip¬ulation of<br />
asbestos rocks rapidly produces many long, thin fibers/ fibrils, since for the<br />
most part, asbestos fibrils are easily separable because of translocation along<br />
a twin plane, which produces a much-reduced cohesion. A lot of data have been<br />
accumulated that suggest that amphibole asbestos and its nonasbestos analogues<br />
possess very different biologic potential. Davis et al (3) demonstrated that<br />
although asbestiform tremolite was extremely carcinogenic when injected into the<br />
peritoneal cavities of rats, nonasbestiform tremolite samples had little or no<br />
carcinogenic potential. These observations suggest that the tremolite<br />
contamination of any material may present a concern only if thin asbestiform<br />
fibers are present.</strong></p>
<p><strong> <a href="http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/molecular-epidemiology-of-mesothelioma.html#more-60" class="more-link" >(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/molecular-epidemiology-of-mesothelioma.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genomics and Proteomics in Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/genomics-and-proteomics-in-mesothelioma.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/genomics-and-proteomics-in-mesothelioma.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Part Two : Molecular Genetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/genomics-and-proteomics-in-mesothelioma.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } 
Advances in molecular biology over the past decade have improved our
understanding of genetic, transcriptional, and translational alter¬ations in
human cancers. The sequencing of the human genome has resulted in the
identification of many known and novel genes. Several groups are engaged in
determining the interactions and regulation of all these genes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } </style>
<p><strong>Advances in molecular biology over the past decade have improved our<br />
understanding of genetic, transcriptional, and translational alter¬ations in<br />
human cancers. The sequencing of the human genome has resulted in the<br />
identification of many known and novel genes. Several groups are engaged in<br />
determining the interactions and regulation of all these genes to ascertain<br />
their function in early detection and pre¬vention of cancer. Recent advances in<br />
functional genomic technology have begun to investigate interactive pathways to<br />
elucidate what, where, when, and how these genes are expressed in an<br />
orchestrated fashion. Other groups have concentrated on proteomics, or the study<br />
of proteins, including their relative amount, distribution, posttransla-tional<br />
modifications, functions, and interactions to address fundamen¬tal biologic<br />
questions in the progression of a disease from a normal to a cancerous state.<br />
This chapter discusses the functional genomics and expression proteomics<br />
approaches employed to date in general and their relevance to mesothelioma in<br />
particular. It is our attempt to provide both novice and experienced<br />
investigators in this field with novel methodologies used in other types of<br />
cancers that might ulti¬mately lead to the early detection and treatment of<br />
mesothelioma.</strong></p>
<h2><strong><span class="style1">Genomics in Cancer Research</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong>The Human Genome Project analysis has described 30,000 to 50,000 genes after DNA<br />
sequencing analyses. In spite of 20% to 30% differ¬ences observed between the<br />
predicted transcriptomes by International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium<br />
(HGSC) and Celera Genomics, these data have provided a tremendous stimulus for<br />
sys¬tematic analysis of various types of cancer. High-resolution analysis of<br />
chromosomal aberrations, genome-wide mutation screens, and ex¬pression profiling<br />
have given investigators a comprehensive view of genetic alterations in many<br />
cancers. These high-throughput tech¬nologies are being vigorously pursued to<br />
gain a complete list of the molecular and genetic causes that drive malignant<br />
transformation and</strong></p>
<p><strong>the possible therapeutic options that may be exploited for clinical benefit.</strong></p>
<p><strong> <a href="http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/genomics-and-proteomics-in-mesothelioma.html#more-54" class="more-link" >(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/genomics-and-proteomics-in-mesothelioma.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extracellular Matrix and Mesothelioma: Some Clues to the Invasive Behavior of Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/extracellular-matrix-and-mesothelioma-some-clues-to-the-invasive-behavior-of-mesothelioma.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/extracellular-matrix-and-mesothelioma-some-clues-to-the-invasive-behavior-of-mesothelioma.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Part Two : Molecular Genetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/extracellular-matrix-and-mesothelioma-some-clues-to-the-invasive-behavior-of-mesothelioma.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } 
Malignant mesotheliomas are highly aggressive diffuse tumors aris¬ing from
mesothelial-lined surfaces. Mesotheliomas spread along mesothelial-lined
surfaces to involve the pericardium, contralateral hemithorax, and peritoneal
cavity by invasion through the diaphragm. The resulting tumor often forms
diffuse thickening of involved surfaces rather than solitary rounded lesions as
seen in other neoplasms (1,2). Malignant mesotheliomas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } </style>
<p>Malignant mesotheliomas are highly aggressive diffuse tumors aris¬ing from<br />
mesothelial-lined surfaces. Mesotheliomas spread along mesothelial-lined<br />
surfaces to involve the pericardium, contralateral hemithorax, and peritoneal<br />
cavity by invasion through the diaphragm. The resulting tumor often forms<br />
diffuse thickening of involved surfaces rather than solitary rounded lesions as<br />
seen in other neoplasms (1,2). Malignant mesotheliomas also invade the<br />
underlying basement mem¬brane and produce metastases in up to 80% of patients<br />
(3–5). Invasion through needle biopsy tracts and incision in the thoracic wall<br />
is a common feature in malignant mesotheliomas (6,7). During this process<br />
mesothelioma cells must interact with extracellular matrix proteins, growth<br />
factors embedded in it, and stromal cells, which participate in synthesis and<br />
modifications of this microenvironment. Today, the cen¬tral theme of research<br />
about tumor etiology, progression, and metasta¬sis focuses more on the crosstalk<br />
between tumor cells, extracellular matrix, and a variety of host cells rather<br />
than the behavior of individ¬ual tumor cells taken out of their<br />
microenvironmental context (8).</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/extracellular-matrix-and-mesothelioma-some-clues-to-the-invasive-behavior-of-mesothelioma.html#more-53" class="more-link" >(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/extracellular-matrix-and-mesothelioma-some-clues-to-the-invasive-behavior-of-mesothelioma.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immune Status and Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/immune-status-and-mesothelioma.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/immune-status-and-mesothelioma.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 04:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Part Two : Molecular Genetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/immune-status-and-mesothelioma.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } 
Although there is a considerable body of published literature concern¬ing the
putative role of immune status in the pathogenesis and pro¬gression of common
malignancies such as lung and breast cancers, this area of research previously
had been relatively neglected with respect to malignant mesothelioma, a
comparatively uncommon tumor. Over the past decade, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .style1 {  background-color: #CCCCFF; } </style>
<p>Although there is a considerable body of published literature concern¬ing the<br />
putative role of immune status in the pathogenesis and pro¬gression of common<br />
malignancies such as lung and breast cancers, this area of research previously<br />
had been relatively neglected with respect to malignant mesothelioma, a<br />
comparatively uncommon tumor. Over the past decade, however, the development of<br />
animal mesothelioma models and the widespread availability of mesothelioma cell<br />
lines to researchers has focused increasing interest in this area. Furthermore,<br />
occupational and environmental asbestos exposure hitherto had been regarded as<br />
the most important global causes of mesothelioma and, since inhaled asbestos<br />
fibers have been shown to suppress innate cel¬lular immunity, studies of<br />
asbestos-exposed individuals and of ex-perimental asbestos exposure have<br />
provided valuable insight into how altered immune status may allow mesothelial<br />
tumors to escape immune surveillance. It is also conceivable that variability in<br />
host immune status, coupled with individual differences in genetic<br />
suscep¬tibility to mesothelioma among similarly exposed subjects (1,2), may<br />
account for the considerable variation in incidence of mesothelioma in different<br />
exposure settings, which can span two orders of magnitude (3–5). Given the now<br />
well-recognized association of simian virus 40 (SV40) with malignant<br />
mesothelioma (6), opportunities now exist to study the immune status and to<br />
develop vaccination protocols of seropositive subjects at risk.</p>
<h2><span class="style1"><strong>Innate Immunity Against Mesothelioma Cells</strong></span></h2>
<p>Non–major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted cytotoxic lym-phocytes<br />
have the capacity to lyse tumor cell targets of various origins and comprise<br />
natural killer (NK) cells, NK T cells, and gd T cells (7). All are derived from<br />
a common lymphoid precursor but differentiate along separate pathways. Whereas<br />
NK cells are CD56+ but lack the CD3 and T-cell receptor markers, NK T cells and<br />
gd T cells coexpress CD3 as well as differing forms of the T-cell receptor.<br />
Unlike conventional T cells,</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/immune-status-and-mesothelioma.html#more-47" class="more-link" >(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesotheliomainfected.com/immune-status-and-mesothelioma.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
